🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice Page 3

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

tyler_CSCS Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 3:54 AM 12 replies 1,823 viewsPage 3 of 3
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Nov 24, 2024 at 8:09 AM#11
FDA_TrackerJim said:
Is 98% purity actually good or is not that straightforward in my experience

This is exactly right. FDA_TrackerJim articulated what I have been trying to explain to my doctor for months. The Is 98% purity actually aspect is the most important factor.

Last edited: Nov 24, 2024 at 11:09 AM
16 9sean_dublin, hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
Nov 24, 2024 at 8:26 AM#12

Reading this thread on Is 98% purity actually hits close to home. Night shift nurse — I started at 271 lbs and felt like I would tried everything.

7 months on tirz and I am a different person. Not just the 46 lbs lost — my energy, my mood, my relationship with food. All transformed.

If you are on the fence about Is 98% purity — take the leap. It was the best health decision I have ever made. ❤️

Last edited: Nov 24, 2024 at 12:26 PM
40 21GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
andrew_nyc
Member
534
2,345
Apr 2024
New York, NY
Nov 24, 2024 at 8:43 AM#13

Dr.DermMIA — that is really helpful context on Is 98% purity actually. Follow-up question: what labs did your doctor order to monitor this?

I am in a similar situation (just started) and trying to set realistic expectations.

Last edited: Nov 24, 2024 at 1:43 PM
31 11PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VanRx_Mike
Member
678
2,890
May 2024
Vancouver, CA
Nov 24, 2024 at 9:00 AM#14

To answer hyun_seoul's question specifically:

From a clinical standpoint, Is 98% purity actually good or is an area where we have good evidence.

The short answer: baseline labs + quarterly monitoring is the standard of care.

The longer answer involves understanding the mechanism of action at the receptor level, which I am happy to elaborate on if helpful.

23 20Dr.Martinez, mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JennaRN
Senior Member
1,987
8,923
Mar 2024
Colorado
Online
Nov 24, 2024 at 9:17 AM#15

Bookmarked 📌 The Is 98% purity info in this thread is essential. Coming back to this for sure.

49 2SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register