🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsProgress & Lab ResultsHas anyone dealt with [premium] couple's transformation?

Has anyone dealt with [premium] couple's transformation?

marco_milano Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 5:46 AM 42 replies 2,236 viewsPage 1 of 9
This thread is more than 26 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
marco_milano
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Milan, IT
Mar 22, 2024 at 7:11 AM#1

Has anyone dealt with [premium] couple's transformation?

Posting this for discussion as it's directly relevant to our progress & lab results community. I'll summarize the key findings and then share my interpretation.

Background: Has anyone dealt with couple's transformation? has been a topic of significant interest. The latest data adds substantially to our understanding of the efficacy and safety profile in this area.

Key findings:

  • Primary endpoint met with statistical significance (p<0.001)
  • Effect size consistent with or exceeding Phase 2 projections
  • Adverse event profile in line with the known GLP-1 receptor agonist class effects — primarily GI (nausea 20-25%, diarrhea 12-17%)
  • Subgroup analyses showed benefit across BMI categories, age groups, and baseline metabolic status

My interpretation:

This is meaningful for several reasons. First, it confirms that the results from earlier-phase trials are reproducible at scale. Second, the safety data with longer follow-up is reassuring. Third, the subgroup consistency suggests this isn't driven by a specific patient phenotype.

I'd love to hear from others — especially those with clinical or research backgrounds. What are the limitations you see? What questions remain unanswered?

References:
[1] See thread title for study identification. Full citation available via PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov.
— marco_milano | Posted in Progress & Lab Results
4 12kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.KarenChen
VIP Member
4,210
24,567
Nov 2023
San Francisco, CA
Mar 22, 2024 at 7:28 AM#2

Clinical perspective on Has anyone dealt with couple's:

I have managed ~150 patients on GLP-1 therapy and this topic comes up frequently. What the data shows — and what I see in practice — is that proper titration prevents most adverse events.

For this specific question, I would recommend: reviewing the relevant clinical guidelines.

40 9JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Mar 22, 2024 at 7:45 AM#3
Dr.KarenChen said:
What the data shows — and what I see in practice — is that proper titration prevents most adverse ev

This is exactly right. Dr.KarenChen articulated what I have been trying to explain to my friends for months. The Has anyone dealt with aspect is what made the difference for me.

Last edited: Mar 22, 2024 at 12:45 PM
34 7COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LabKate
Senior Member
2,678
11,234
Jan 2024
Oregon
Mar 22, 2024 at 8:02 AM#4

Relevant to Has anyone dealt with — here is my latest bloodwork comparison:

Key improvements: A1C 8.0% → 5.3%, triglycerides 219 → 119 mg/dL, hsCRP 6.0 → 1.3 mg/L. All on tirzepatide for 11 months.

The inflammatory marker drop is what impresses me most. Consistent with the SELECT trial's cardiovascular findings.

4 12emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MASHdoc_SA
Member
456
2,345
Aug 2024
San Antonio, TX
Mar 22, 2024 at 8:19 AM#5
Dr.KarenChen said:
What the data shows — and what I see in practice — is that proper titration prevents most adverse ev

I respect Dr.KarenChen perspective but I think this oversimplifies things a bit. Re: Has anyone dealt with — the subgroup analyses show meaningful heterogeneity.

I am not saying Dr.KarenChen wrong entirely — just that the picture is more nuanced than a blanket statement. The STEP data specifically shows dose-dependent variation.

Last edited: Mar 22, 2024 at 11:19 AM
37 3kate.chem, DataDave, Dr.GutHealth and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Amazing transformation! Starting at 287 lbs, I'm now at 162 lbs after 18 months on semaglutide 2.4mg/wk. These photos show my progress at months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18. The body recomposition has been incredible — DEXA shows 23% body fat, down from 42%...

Premium Content

Progress photos are available to Premium subscribers only

Subscribe — $4.99/mo
1239

Similar Threads

100 lbs lost in 14 months — comprehensive DEXA and lab data16 replies
12-month metabolic panel comparison — before and after GLP-122 replies
A1C from 9.2 to 5.4 in 8 months — my diabetes reversal journey16 replies
6-month body recomposition — DEXA, labs, progress photos22 replies
1-year semaglutide anniversary — honest review with all data16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register