🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesSOUL trial preliminary data — November 2025

SOUL trial preliminary data — November 2025

JenMemphis Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 2:50 AM 51 replies 2,130 viewsPage 1 of 11
This thread is more than 14 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
JenMemphis
Member
267
1,234
Jan 2025
Memphis, TN
Mar 16, 2025 at 4:15 AM#1

Anyone else dealing with soul trial preliminary data november 2025 from a cost perspective?

I have been paying $280/month and I am trying to get insurance to cover it.

Share what you are paying and what you are getting — transparency helps everyone.

48 5MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Mar 16, 2025 at 4:32 AM#2
JenMemphis said:
SOUL trial preliminary data November 2025

I respect JenMemphis perspective but I think this oversimplifies things a bit. Re: SOUL trial preliminary data — the effect size varies considerably by population.

I am not saying JenMemphis wrong entirely — just that the picture is more nuanced than a blanket statement. The SURMOUNT data specifically shows baseline BMI-dependent responses.

Last edited: Mar 16, 2025 at 8:32 AM
46 24PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TirzTom
Senior Member
2,789
9,876
Feb 2024
Florida
Online
Mar 16, 2025 at 4:49 AM#3

+1 to JenMemphis. Especially the point about "SOUL trial preliminary data November 20..." — I have seen the same in my own experience with SOUL trial preliminary.

Last edited: Mar 16, 2025 at 8:49 AM
26 23Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.Martinez
Medical Advisor
3,891
28,456
Nov 2023
Boston, MA
Online
Mar 16, 2025 at 5:06 AM#4

As a healthcare provider, I want to add some clinical context to this discussion on SOUL trial preliminary data November.

Building on what JenMemphis said — the evidence base here is well-established. The key publications to reference are from the SURMOUNT program[1].

Key clinical points:

  1. Efficacy is dose-dependent and typically requires 4-5 weeks to reach steady state
  2. Side effect profile is predictable and usually manageable with standard protocols
  3. Monitoring should include baseline labs and follow-up at 3-month intervals
  4. Patient education significantly improves outcomes and adherence

Standard disclaimer: this is educational, not individualized medical advice.

References:
[1] See thread title for relevant study identification.
22 15Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
Mar 16, 2025 at 5:23 AM#5
TirzTom said:
Especially the point about "SOUL trial preliminary data November 20

Gonna push back on this one. SOUL trial preliminary data is not that straightforward in my experience. I have been on this for 18 months and the reality is messier than the trials suggest.

Don't get me wrong — the medication works. But adherence is harder than people admit. We should be honest about that.

9 22pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo, JakeBK_lifts and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register