Nov 12, 2025 at 12:42 AM#36
Bookmarked 📌 The SELECT cost-effectiv info in this thread is essential. Coming back to this for sure.
17 19PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 12, 2025 at 12:59 AM#37
Slightly tangential to SELECT cost-effectiveness but pam_columbus reminded me — has the insurance landscape changed recently?
I know it is not exactly on-topic but it seems related enough to ask here rather than starting a new thread. Apologies if this has been covered — I did search first.
32 23Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 12, 2025 at 1:16 AM#38
Bookmarked 📌 The SELECT cost-effectiv info in this thread is essential. Coming back to this for sure.
34 23KevinCompounds, TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 12, 2025 at 1:33 AM#39
Reading this thread on SELECT cost-effectiveness hits close to home. Dad of 2 checking in — I started at 277 lbs and felt like I would tried everything.
13 months on tirz and I am a different person. Not just the 52 lbs lost — my energy, my mood, my relationship with food. All transformed.
If you are on the fence about SELECT cost-effectiv — take the leap. It was the best health decision I have ever made. ❤️
3 19Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 12, 2025 at 1:50 AM#40
Adding my data to this SELECT cost-effectiveness discussion:
| Metric | Baseline | Month 5 | Month 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 248 lbs | 243 lbs | 203 lbs |
| A1C | 7.2% | 6.0% | 5.2% |
| hsCRP | 7.0 | 4.0 | 0.6 |
Protocol: Semaglutide 1.7mg/wk, resistance training 3x/wk, protein 1.5g/kg/day.
Last edited: Nov 12, 2025 at 4:50 AM
15 3TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN, LabKate and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report